Colorado Medical Malpractice Attorneys – Burg Simpson

Medical Malpractice Frequently Asked Questions

If you or someone you love has been the victim of medical negligence, please contact us today to schedule your free initial consultation. We’ll review your medical malpractice claim with you and help determine how to best proceed. If you need more information, call one of our veteran Colorado medical lawsuit attorneys at 303-792-5595 to schedule an appointment today.

When you or someone you care about suffers an injury during or as the result of medical treatment, the question of whether the injury gives rise to a legal claim can be a difficult one. At Burg Simpson, our Colorado medical injury attorneys are here to help you find the answer. In civil litigation, such as a medical malpractice lawsuit, it is the plaintiff (injured party) who carries the burden of proof. This means that you must be able to demonstrate, to the required legal standards, that:

  1. The healthcare providers you want to sue actually made an error in the care they provided; AND
  2. Their specific error caused or exacerbated your injury, or eliminated a chance you may have had for recovery; AND
  3. That you have suffered damages in an amount sufficient to justify the costs and time associated with litigation, and for which you can be compensated by a jury.

There are several instances where physicians or other healthcare providers may do or say something insensitive, incorrect, or downright rude—this type of conduct, while it may amount to a poor bedside manner, is not going to be considered malpractice.

If you believe you were injured because of a healthcare provider’s negligence, please call us to discuss your situation. We’re here to help. There is never any charge for an initial consultation.

There are several types of attorney fee arrangements that may be available to you. Your financial means is an important consideration in choosing the manner in which you will pay your lawyers. Briefly, the various types of fee arrangements are as follows:

  • “Time based” is fee determined by the amount of time involved, such as a rate per hour, day or week.
  • “Fixed” means a fee that is based on an agreed amount regardless of the time or effort involved or the result obtained. Some attorneys also call this a flat rate.
  • “Contingent” is a predetermined percentage or amount that’s payable only upon attaining a recovery, regardless of the time or effort involved.

Occasionally, some combination of the above fee arrangements may be used. Not all attorneys offer this variety of fee arrangements. You need to determine what type of arrangement that suits your needs, and you may need to talk to multiple attorneys to find the fee arrangement you need.

Fees
Fees are what you pay your attorneys and paralegals for their time and expertise. If your case is being handled on a contingency fee agreement, that means you won’t pay any fees to the attorneys unless they get a recovery for you. If there is a recovery, the contingent fee agreement will dictate the percentage of that recovery that will be paid to the attorneys for their work on the case. If there is no recovery, a contingent fee agreement usually will state that no fees will be charged to you. If your case is being handled on an hourly basis, you will receive a monthly bill detailing the time spent by any of the attorneys or paralegals on your case, and the rates for each of those people may vary. You should receive a disclosure at the time you sign your fee agreement as to what each person’s hourly rate is. On an hourly fee agreement, you will be required to pay your bills each month, even if you do not get a good outcome with your case.

Costs
Costs are different from fees. Costs/expenses are the funds advanced on your behalf in order to prepare your claim. Costs accrue in cases without regard to whether the client has an hourly or contingent fee agreement. With a contingent fee agreement, you will repay the law firm for your costs at the end of the litigation, usually out of the recovery that is obtained for you. If you are on an hourly fee agreement, you may be required to pay the costs monthly, as part of your monthly bill.

How costs are handled by law firms
Firms handle costs in different ways. Some firms will ask you to offer collateral to cover the costs of your litigation, which could include taking a lien on your house. If you surrender a lien on your home to cover the costs of your case, and you don’t pay those costs back to the firm that holds the lien, they could foreclose on your home and take it from you. Firms with strong financial resources generally don’t engage in this practice. As such, be very cautious when hiring an attorney, and carefully read the fee agreement so that you clearly understand what the costs arrangement really is. Not all firms require their clients to give title to their homes or put up other forms of collateral to cover the costs of pursuing their claim, so it’s very important to do your homework before hiring a law firm to handle your case.

Medical malpractice cases are difficult, time consuming, and expensive. On average, it takes between 18-24 months from the initial filing of the case to resolution, either through settlement or trial. Some cases can be resolved more quickly, and others take even longer. This is dependent on the issues involved in your case. Even when claims resolve quickly, this often means a time period of 12-18 months. Other attorneys may tell you that they can get your case resolved more quickly than that, but it’s not wise to rush to settlement.

Settlements reached after an incomplete investigation, and without thorough preparation of the claim, tend to be lower. In addition, if you resolve your case too quickly, you might find later that you have additional injuries or damages you weren’t aware of at first. But settlements are final, and you can’t go back later and ask for more money. Therefore, it’s important that you fully understand the extent of your damages before accepting any settlement offers.

You should plan on taking your medical malpractice case to trial. There are a variety of reasons for this, but the current trend in malpractice litigation is that doctors will defend their care, even if it’s poor care. It is actually uncommon for cases to settle before being filed, contrary to what many potential plaintiffs believe. Just sending a letter is rarely enough to resolve your case.

That said, settlements are common in this type of litigation, and plaintiffs have the best chance of obtaining fair value for their case when it is thoroughly and properly prepared for trial. When your case is handled by a reputable firm prepared for trial, settlements are more common and are usually larger.

You’re under no obligation to accept an offer of settlement if you don’t believe it’s sufficient to compensate you for your injuries. Your attorneys will counsel you on the risks and benefits of accepting any offer of settlement, but the decision will ultimately be yours to make.

Assessing the potential value of your medical malpractice case is an important part of representing you. Value in this context is not a personal judgment, but rather a conclusion of the likely outcomes of you case.

Each state has its own rules about how much money a plaintiff injured by medical malpractice can recover for their injuries. Some states do not place limits on damages, and others do. Some state with limits on damages limit only certain kinds of damages and not others. What this means is that the value of your claim in Texas might be vastly different from the value of the exact same claim in Minnesota or Maryland.

Here are some of the factors that impact the value of medical malpractice claims:

  • Whether or not the plaintiff has permanent injuries that require ongoing care.
  • Whether or not the plaintiff has a normal life expectancy or possibly a shortened one because of their injuries.
  • Whether the plaintiff was negligent and caused or in any way contributed to their own injuries.
  • What the state laws are limiting the amounts of damages.
  • Whether the jurisdiction in which the case is filed is more conservative (less likely for a jury to give a big award) or more liberal (more likely to give a big jury award).
  • What other cases with similar injuries have settled for in the recent past.
  • Whether the plaintiff has lost the ability to work at all, or to work in the same capacity as before the injury.
  • Whether there are dependents the plaintiff can no longer support by because of their injuries.
  • Whether people need to be hired by the plaintiff to perform household duties or run a home business that the plaintiff can no longer perform.
  • How much the plaintiff has lost or spent out of pocket for medical care and household services as a result of their injuries.
  • Pain and suffering damages are limited in many states. While many plaintiffs feel these damages are the most important, often they’re not worth much because of damages caps that may have been imposed by the state.

To determine the value of your case, we’ll hire and consult with the right experts. Only after a thorough evaluation of your case can a realistic value be determined.

When you’re involved in a motor vehicle accident, and the person who hit you ran a red light, you won’t have to hire an expert to prove the other driver was negligent, because a jury of lay people will understand that—they know what the rules of the road are. But when we sue a professional, such as a physician, the issues aren’t understood as easily, and we have to bring in experts to help the jury understand what occurred and how the physician’s conduct caused an injury.

To prove a medical negligence case, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the physician made a treatment decision that no reasonable physician would have made under the same or similar circumstances. That unreasonable action by the physician is called a breach of the standard of care. Plaintiff must also show how the standard of care violation caused their injury, and must show what their injury is worth, in dollars. Experts are needed for each of these elements.

Liability—Expert(s) to Describe How the Doctor Breached the Standard of Care
As a rule, the person being sued can only be criticized by an expert in the same field of specialty with the same or similar credentials. If the defendant is a physician board certified in general surgery, then the expert retained to criticize his care must also be a board certified general surgeon. There are a few exceptions to this general rule, but only a few. If the person being sued is a nurse, then the plaintiff must retain a similarly qualified nurse to render opinions about the defendant’s error(s). It is not uncommon to have more than one defendant in a medical malpractice claim, and, when this happens, the plaintiff will need a standard of care expert qualified to comment on each one. This may require hiring multiple experts to discuss the standard of care applicable to each defendant and how that standard was breached (broken).

Causation—Expert(s) to Describe How the Mistake Caused the Injury
Additional experts will likely be required to discuss how the defendant’s actions caused the plaintiff’s injury. Consider the example of the defendant who is a family doctor who prescribed the wrong medication to a patient, and the patient had a bad reaction to the medication and suffered a stroke as a result. In that case, the plaintiff will need a family doctor with similar credentials as the defendant to explain why the prescription was wrong, and may also need to hire a neurologist to explain the stroke and a pharmacologist to explain the mechanism underlying how the medication caused the stroke. The plaintiff may also need other specialists to explain various other aspects of the causal link between the doctor’s mistake and the injury that resulted. Sometimes the doctor testifying about the standard of care can also talk about causation, but this is not the ordinary scenario. Most of the time, plaintiff will need multiple experts to cover these various issues.

Damages—the Life Care Planner
One of the main goals of a medical negligence lawsuit is to obtain funds that can provide future medical care the plaintiff needs as a result of their injury. We can put a price on economic damages such as medical needs, loss of wages, and the loss of the ability to work. Plaintiffs with a permanent injury that will require future care typically need an expert called a life care planner. This expert will calculate the cost, in dollars, of providing all the care plaintiff will need going forward (life care plan).

Damages—the Economist
An economist is also hired to calculate the value of past and future medical bills and lost wages. The economist also takes the life care plan and calculates, accounting for inflation and interest earnings over time, its net present value. That is, how much money we would need to put into the bank today in order to pay, over the plaintiff’s lifetime, for all the care detailed in the life care plan? The life care planner and the economist work together to create a picture of how much the plaintiff’s claim is worth, in today’s dollars. However, it is important to note that neither of these experts adds any compensation for the plaintiff’s pain and suffering.

If you have an injury as a result of negligent medical care, a successful injury lawsuit will almost always give rise to what is called a “subrogation interest” or “subrogation lien.” If you have health insurance, either through a private company or a federal program, a subrogation lien is almost a certainty. Therefore, as a medical malpractice plaintiff, you need to understand what these interests are and how they can affect your claim.

Whatever health insurance coverage you have, there’s a provision in your contract for insurance (or in the federal law) which basically says: We, the insurer, are going to pay for the medical care you receive. But, if you find out that you needed medical care as a result of an injury caused by someone else’s negligence, and we paid for any of that care, we want to be paid back in the event you receive money from a lawsuit against the person who caused your injury. In other words, if you make a claim and get a settlement, you have to pay us back for any claims we paid on your behalf.

In private policies, this language can be found in a section of the policy usually titled “Third Party Liability.” For Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded or state-funded health programs, this requirement is actually found in the federal and state laws.

Yes. Your insurance policy (or the applicable laws) specifically tells you that notifying the insurer in the event you were hurt by another person’s negligence is your responsibility.

If you fail to do so, the insurer can sue you. Your lawyers, as well as the defendants’ lawyers, can even be sued for their part in failing to protect the rights of a subrogation lien holder. This means that the attorneys on both sides need to understand how subrogation works and how to protect your interests to make sure that you cannot be sued later for failing to meet your obligations.

Different lawyers handle these issues in different ways. Sometimes your lawyer will hire another lawyer to handle these liens, and sometimes your lawyer can handle them on his own. You need to be sure you ask your law firm what their practice is, and whether or not you will be charged additional fees or costs in conjunction with getting your liens resolved.

For whoever handles your liens, the process is essentially this:

  1. Health insurance providers are identified from information you provide, as well as from your medical records.
  2. Every insurer who paid any claims or is listed anywhere in your files will be contacted and notified of pending litigation involving you, their insured.
  3. Each insurer is asked to provide a list of all paid claims from the time period surrounding your injuries. Periodically throughout the course of litigation, your insurers may be asked to provide updated listings of paid claims.
  4. When the case nears resolution, the amount of your liens is considered as part of the settlement, so you can make a better decision about whether any potential settlement offer will be satisfactory. Your attorney will then review the itemized list of paid claims and notify the insurer which claims were related to the injury that gave rise to your lawsuit, and which weren’t.
  5. Based on that information, your lien amount (the amount you have to pay back to the insurer after your settlement) may be adjusted to subtract out the claims not caused by malpractice.
  6. Additional discounts may then be negotiated. Your Denver medical injury lawyer should ask the lien holder to discount the lien amount based on the fact that you had to pay attorneys’ fees to get your settlement, and the insurer didn’t have to do anything at all—the money is just coming to them by virtue of the work your lawyers did, and that you paid for.
  7. Once a final lien amount is reached, reflecting all discounts and adjustments that can be obtained for you, it must be paid from your settlement proceeds BEFORE FUNDS ARE DISBURSED TO YOU. You may be able to receive some of your settlement money, but the lawyers will be required to hold back enough money to pay the liens and will be required to keep that money in trust until the liens are resolved. Only then will they be able to refund/disburse back to you any amount not needed to pay liens because of discounts that may be negotiated for you.
  8. Because you cannot get your settlement proceeds until your liens have been satisfied, it will become very important to you to know that your attorneys have a handle on what to do and how to get your liens resolved as soon as possible. Failure to handle liens in a timely way can result in a situation where your case has concluded, but your money is tied up and you cannot have it because liens are unresolved.
  9. Be aware that Medicare and Medicaid sometimes take a very long time to provide a final settlement amount that they will accept, so it is extremely important to initiate the lien resolution process EARLY in the litigation. Notifying the insurers should be among the very first things your attorneys do after filing your lawsuit. Some states require that they receive notice of your claim within days of the filing of your claim, and if you fail to provide timely notice, you can be denied the benefit of any discounts. If you fail to provide any notice to them, you can also be sued. Experienced medical malpractice lawyers (or subrogation lawyers if retained on your behalf) can usually negotiate some sort of discount for your liens. At Burg Simpson, we will have a plan in place for handling your liens so that you will not have to worry about these issues.
Alan K. Simpson Argues For a 28th Amendment

 August 16, 2017

Alan K. Simpson Argues For a 28th Amendment

Are corporation’s people? It might sound like a simple question, but it’s one the U.S. Supreme Court answered in the affirmative when it handed down its landmark Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision in 2010. That 5-4 ruling struck down a prohibition against certain election communications by nonprofits, corporations, labor unions, and other associations…. Read more »

Michael S. Burg Blasts Supreme Court Big Pharma Ruling

 August 15, 2017

Michael S. Burg Blasts Supreme Court Big Pharma Ruling

Earlier this summer, the U.S. Supreme Court handed Big Pharma a big victory. In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, the high court struck down California’s effort to widen the scope of non-residents seeking relief from dangerous drugs. In an 8-1 decision, the court ruled against nearly 680 plaintiffs who were suing the… Read more »

Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh & Jardine Attorneys Recognized in 2018 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©

 August 15, 2017

Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh & Jardine Attorneys Recognized in 2018 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America©

  Twenty-Three Attorneys Were Listed in The Best Lawyers in America ® 2018 Four Attorneys Listed as 2018 Best Lawyers “Lawyer of the Year” In Their Practice Area and Region August 15, 2017 (Denver, CO) – Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh & Jardine, P.C., one of America’s foremost plaintiff trial firms, is proud to announce several… Read more »

Weyerhaeuser Floor Joists Could Be Poisoning Your Home

 August 9, 2017

Weyerhaeuser Floor Joists Could Be Poisoning Your Home

August 9, 2017 (Denver, CO) – Thousands of new homes may be uninhabitable due to excessive levels of formaldehyde, a known carcinogen, found in the joists of finished and unfinished basements. Homeowners and construction workers have reported feeling ill, with burning eyes and respiratory issues, after exposure to hazardous levels of formaldehyde present in these… Read more »

HR 1215 Bill – Colorado Medical Lawsuit Attorneys – Burg Simpson

 August 10, 2017

Legislation Threatens Medical Malpractice Victims

While Congress distracted the country with the drama of a failed Affordable Care Act repeal vote, lawmakers quietly – and barely – passed HR 1215, the “Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017,” on June 28. The bill makes it much harder for victims of medical malpractice to hold health care providers responsible for their… Read more »

Drive Safe – Denver Medical Malpractice Attorneys – Burg Simpson

 July 11, 2017

Lawmakers Revisit Medical Malpractice Caps

The specter of non-economic damage caps have haunted medical malpractice victims – and the attorneys who fight for them – since the 1970s. But its hasn’t seen this level of renewed interest since former President George W. Bush proposed a nationwide cap on medical malpractice awards in 2003. Just before the July 4th recess, the… Read more »

Birth Injury – Denver Medical Malpractice Lawyers – Burg Simpson

 May 16, 2017

A Perfect Storm for Birth Injury — When Staff is Too Busy to Care

When a baby suffers brain damage during the process of labor and delivery, sometimes it’s simply a tragic accident. Sometimes the damage could have been avoided. When that’s the case, and medical professional negligence caused the damage, then the law holds those people responsible. According to the latest “National HealthCare Quality Report,” injuries strike seven… Read more »

Save Women’s Lives - Denver Medical Malpractice Attorneys – Burg Simpson

 April 14, 2017

Could Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Save Women’s Lives?

Breast cancer affects one in every eight women in the United States. About 250,000 women are diagnosed with invasive breast cancer every year. This represents about 12 percent of the population. As the breast cancer epidemic continues, the screening and diagnostic process scrambles to keep up with the demand, and the complex nature of the… Read more »

Ring of Fire: Even Republicans Are Disgusted by The Republican Party

 May 3, 2016

Ring of Fire: Even Republicans Are Disgusted by The Republican Party

A Ring of Fire first! Host Farron Cousins talks to former Senator Alan Simpson in a unique opportunity on Ring of Fire to speak with a Republican about the current state of the Republican Party.

CBS 4: Michael Burg Inducted to Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

 April 28, 2016

CBS 4: Michael Burg Inducted to Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

CBS 4 in Denver highlights Burg Simpson attorney Michael S. Burg’s induction into the Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Radio 850KOA: Michael Burg Inducted to Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

 April 28, 2016

Radio 850KOA: Michael Burg Inducted to Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame

Denver’s Radio 850KOA ran a news story about Michael Burg’s induction into the Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame.

Burg Simpson Legal Minute: Civil Justice System

 April 21, 2016

Burg Simpson Legal Minute: Civil Justice System

Burg Simpson shareholder Calvin Tregre Jr. examines changes to the civil justice system, where limitations have been placed on monetary awards to seriously injured victims of corporate negligence. Are you protected?

Trial Talk magazine

 November 18, 2015

Trial Talk: Cross Appeal? Now What?

Burg Simpson Attorney and Shareholder Diane Vaksdal Smith’s article, published in CTLA’s Trial Talk, April/May 2015, addresses specifics of appellate practice and procedure. Download full article PDF

The Trial Lawyer Magazine

 November 18, 2015

Homebuilders v. Homeowners

Threats to Shift an Already Tilted Playing Field More in Favor of Homebuilders Burg Simpson attorneys Jennifer A. Seidman and Ronald M. Sandgrund examine what could happen if lawmakers allow builders to take advantage of and mischaracterize the causes of the Great Recession’s lingering effects, and the facts regarding the real causes of the decline… Read more »

Pop Culture

 November 18, 2015

Part IV – Does Popular Culture Influence Lawyers, Judges, and Juries?

TV and Movies – What We Love and Love to Hate Twelve Angry Men, To Kill a Mockingbird, the O.J. Simpson debacle…do these movies and televised lawsuits influence decision makers? Burg Simpson attorney Ronald M. Sandgrund continues the panel series dialogue, with Part IV addressing TV and movies. Download full article PDF

Pop Culture Part 3

 November 18, 2015

Part III – Does Popular Culture Influence Lawyers, Judges, and Juries?

Managing Popular Culture’s Influence Popular culture generally has been defined as “culture based on the tastes of ordinary people rather than an educated elite.” Part III investigates whether popular culture may be undermining the rule of law. Burg Simpson attorney Ronald M. Sandgrund mediates this panel article. Download full article PDF

Top 100 National Trial Lawyers Legal 500 Best Lawyers in America Super Lawyers US News 2014 US News 2014 Plantiffs Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers